<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Versioned C++</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mark.santaniello.com/archives/197/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mark.santaniello.com/archives/197</link>
	<description>the body of a very slow loop</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mark++ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Musings on Versioned C++</title>
		<link>http://mark.santaniello.com/archives/197#comment-3437</link>
		<dc:creator>mark++ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Musings on Versioned C++</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mark.santaniello.net/archives/197#comment-3437</guid>
		<description>[...] A couple of weeks ago I was bemoaning the lack of a C/C++ analog to Perl&#8217;s require statement. Today, I realized we&#8217;ve already solved this problem. Just google for __GNUC__ or _MSC_VER to see what I mean. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A couple of weeks ago I was bemoaning the lack of a C/C++ analog to Perl&#8217;s require statement. Today, I realized we&#8217;ve already solved this problem. Just google for __GNUC__ or _MSC_VER to see what I mean. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
